Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 119
Filter
1.
Arq. Asma, Alerg. Imunol ; 7(2): 209-212, 20230600. ilus
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1509863

ABSTRACT

O tratamento das doenças autoimunes com imunobiológicos é uma opção segura na prática clínica. A simultaneidade na ocorrência de doenças imunomediadas em um mesmo indivíduo pode determinar a necessidade da associação dos imunobiológicos para controle dos sintomas e melhora da qualidade de vida dos doentes. Relatamos o caso de uma paciente com artrite reumatoide em uso de etanercepte, que necessitou da associação de omalizumabe para o tratamento de urticária crônica espontânea.


Autoimmune diseases can be safely treated in clinical practice with immunobiologicals. The simultaneous occurrence of multiple immune-mediated diseases in the same individual could require a combination of immunobiologicals to control symptoms and improve quality of life. We report the case of a patient with rheumatoid arthritis who was receiving etanercept and required additional omalizumab for chronic spontaneous urticaria.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Aged
2.
Rev. argent. reumatolg. (En línea) ; 34(1): 3-15, ene. 2023. tab
Article in Spanish | BINACIS, LILACS | ID: biblio-1449435

ABSTRACT

Introducción: conocer la seguridad de las drogas actualmente disponibles para el tratamiento de las enfermedades reumáticas es muy importante al momento de tomar decisiones terapéuticas objetivas e individualizadas en la consulta médica diaria. Asimismo, datos de la vida real amplían el conocimiento revelado por los ensayos clínicos. Objetivos: describir los eventos adversos (EA) reportados, estimar su frecuencia e identificar los factores relacionados con su desarrollo. Materiales y métodos: se utilizaron datos BIOBADASAR, un registro voluntario y prospectivo de seguimiento de EA de tratamientos biológicos y sintéticos dirigidos en pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas inmunomediadas. Los pacientes son seguidos hasta la muerte, pérdida de seguimiento o retiro del consentimiento informado. Para este análisis se extrajeron datos recopilados hasta el 31 de enero de 2023. Resultados: se incluyó un total de 6253 pacientes, los cuales aportaron 9533 ciclos de tratamiento, incluyendo 3647 (38,3%) ciclos sin drogas modificadoras de la enfermedad biológicas y sintéticas dirigidas (DME-b/sd) y 5886 (61,7%) con DME-b/sd. Dentro de estos últimos, los más utilizados fueron los inhibidores de TNF y abatacept. Se reportaron 5890 EA en un total de 2701 tratamientos (844 y 1857 sin y con DME-b/sd, respectivamente), con una incidencia de 53,9 eventos cada 1000 pacientes/año (IC 95% 51,9-55,9). La misma fue mayor en los ciclos con DME-b/sd (71,1 eventos cada 1000 pacientes/año, IC 95% 70,7-77,5 versus 33,7, IC 95% 31,5-36,1; p<0,001). Las infecciones, particularmente las de la vía aérea superior, fueron los EA más frecuentes en ambos grupos. El 10,9% fue serio y el 1,1% provocó la muerte del paciente. El 18,7% de los ciclos con DME-b/sd fue discontinuado a causa de un EA significativamente mayor a lo reportado en el otro grupo (11,5%; p<0,001). En el análisis ajustado, las DME-b/sd se asociaron a mayor riesgo de presentar al menos un EA (HR 1,82, IC 95% 1,64-1,96). De igual manera, la mayor edad, el mayor tiempo de evolución, el antecedente de enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica, el diagnóstico de lupus eritematoso sistémico y el uso de corticoides se asociaron a mayor riesgo de EA. Conclusiones: la incidencia de EA fue significativamente superior durante los ciclos de tratamientos que incluían DME-b/sd.


Introduction: knowing the efficacy and safety of the drugs currently available for the treatment of rheumatic diseases is very important when making objective and individualized therapeutic decisions in daily medical consultation. Likewise, real-life data extends the knowledge revealed by clinical trials. Objectives: to describe the reported adverse events (AEs), estimate their frequency and identify factors associated to them. Materials and methods: BIOBADASAR data were used, which is a voluntary, prospective follow-up registry of AEs of biological and synthetic treatments in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases. Patients are followed until death, loss of followup, or withdrawal of informed consent. To carry out this analysis, the data collected up to January 31, 2023 was extracted. Results: a total of 6253 patients were included, who contributed with 9533 treatment periods, including 3647 (38.3%) periods without b/ts-DMARDs and 5886 (61.7%) with b/ts-DMARDs. Among the latter, the most used were TNF inhibitors and abatacept. A total of 5890 AEs were reported in a total of 2701 treatments (844 and 1857 without and with b/ts-DMARDs, respectively), with an incidence of 53.9 events per 1000 patients/ year (95% CI 51.9-55.9). It was higher during the periods with b/ts-DMARDs (71.1 events per 1000 patients/year, 95% CI 70.7-77.5 vs 33.7, 95% CI 31.5-36.1, p<0.001). Infections, particularly those of the upper respiratory tract, were the most frequent AEs in both groups. 10.9% were severe and 1.1% were associated with the death of the patient. 18.7% of the periods with b/ts-DMARDs were discontinued due to an AE, significantly higher than that reported in the other group (11.5%; p<0.001). In the adjusted analysis, b/ts-DMARDs were associated with a higher risk of presenting at least one AE (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.64-1.96). Similarly, older age, longer evolution time, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus, and use of corticosteroids were associated with a higher risk of AE. Conclusions: the incidence of AEs was significantly higher during those treatment periods that included DME-b/sd.


Subject(s)
Biological Therapy , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Synthetic Drugs
3.
Arq. gastroenterol ; 60(1): 48-56, Jan.-Mar. 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1439388

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Background: Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are chronic diseases that result from the deregulation of the mucosal immune system of the gastrointestinal tract. The use of biological therapies, including infliximab (IFX), is one of the strategies to treat both CD and UC. The IFX treatment is monitored by complementary tests, namely: fecal calprotectin (FC); C-reactive protein (CRP); and endoscopic and cross-sectional imaging. Besides, serum IFX evaluation and antibody detection are also used. Objective: To evaluate trough levels (TL) and antibodies in a population with inflammatory bowel (IBD) disease undergoing treatment with IFX, and the factors that might impact the treatment effectiveness. Methods: Retrospective, cross-sectional study with patients with IBD that were assessed for TL and antibody (ATI) levels in a southern Brazilian hospital, from June 2014 to July 2016. Results: The study assessed 55 patients (52.7% female) submitted to serum IFX and antibody evaluations (95 blood samples, 55 first test; 30 second test, and 10 as third testing. Forty-five (47.3%) cases were diagnosed with CD (81.8%), and ten with UC (18.2%). Serum levels were adequate in 30 samples (31.57%), subtherapeutic in 41 (43.15%), and supratherapeutic in 24 (25.26%). IFX dosages were optimized for 40 patients (42.10%), maintained for 31 (32.63%), and discontinued for 7 (7.60%). The intervals between infusions were shortened in 17.85% of the cases. In 55 tests (55.79%), the therapeutic approach was exclusively defined according to IFX and/or serum antibody levels. The assessment of patients one year later indicated that: the approach was maintained with IFX for thirty-eight patients (69.09%); the class of biological agent was changed for eight (14.54%); changes using the same class of biological agent occurred for two patients (3.63%); the medication was discontinued and not replaced for three patients (5.45%), and four patients (7.27%) were lost to follow-up. Conclusion: There were no differences in TL between groups with or without immunosuppressants, serum albumin (ALB), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), FC, CRP, and endoscopic and imaging examinations. Current therapeutic approach could be maintained for almost 70% of patients. Thus, serum and antibody levels are a useful tool in the follow-up of patients undergoing maintenance therapy and after treatment induction in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.


RESUMO Contexto: A doença de Crohn e a colite ulcerativa são doenças crônicas nas quais existem desregulação do sistema imune da mucosa do trato gastrointestinal. Uma das terapias usadas no tratamento dessas doenças são as medicações biológicas, entre elas o Infliximabe. A monitorização do tratamento dos pacientes com Iinfliximabe é feita por exames complementares: calprotectina fecal, pesquisa de atividade inflamatória, exames endoscópicos e imagem. Utiliza-se, também a dosagem do nível sérico do Infliximabe e a pesquisa de anticorpos. Objetivo: Analisar uma população com doenças inflamatórias intestinais, em tratamento com Infliximabe, submetida a avaliação do nível sérico do Infliximabe e do anticorpo, além de possíveis fatores que possam alterar ou contribuir no tratamento. Métodos: Trata-se de estudo retrospectivo, transversal, realizado por meio da revisão dos prontuários dos pacientes com doença inflamatória intestinal, em um hospital sul-brasileiro, no período de junho de 2014 até julho de 2016, que foram submetidos a avaliação dos níveis séricos de Infliximabe e do anticorpo. Resultados: Foram incluídos 55 pacientes, submetidos a dosagem do Infliximabe e do anticorpo, totalizando 95 coletas sanguíneas. Destes, 55 realizaram uma primeira coleta, 30 tiveram uma segunda amostra coletada e 10 coletaram uma terceira vez. Vinte e nove pacientes eram do sexo feminino (52,7%) e vinte e seis do sexo masculino (43.2%). Quarenta e cinco (47,3%) casos tinham diagnóstico de doença de Crohn (81,8%) e 10 de colite ulcerativa (18,2%). Em relação ao nível sérico encontrou-se nível adequado em 30 coletas (31,57%), subterapêutico em 41 coletas (43,15%) e supraterapêutico em 24 coletas (25,26%). A prescrição foi otimizada em 40 (42,10%) casos, mantida em 31 (32,63%) pacientes, suspensa em 7 (7,60%) ou que o intervalo entre as infusões fosse aumentado (17,85%). Na análise geral, em 53 coletas (55,79%) a conduta foi definida em função exclusivamente da dosagem sérica do Infliximabe e/ou do anticorpo, já em relação, apenas a primeira coleta obteve-se 33 (60%) pacientes. Avaliando-se os pacientes um ano após, obteve-se: em 38 (69,09%) pacientes a conduta foi mantida com Infliximabe e, em 8 (14,54%) foi optado por troca de classe, em 2 (3,63%) foi optado por troca da medicação na mesma classe, em 3 (5,45%) pacientes a medicação foi suspensa e não foi substituída e, em 4 (7,27%), perdeu-se o seguimento. Conclusão: Não encontrou-se diferença entre os níveis de Infliximabe entre os grupos com ou sem imunossupressor, albumina sérica, velocidade de hemossedimentação, Calprotectina, Proteína C reativa, exames endoscópicos e exames de imagem. A conduta atual pode ser mantida em quase 70% dos pacientes. Concluindo, a dosagem do nível sérico e do anticorpo é ferramenta útil no acompanhamento dos pacientes em terapia de manutenção e após a indução de tratamento em pacientes com Doença Inflamatória Intestinal.

4.
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics ; (12): 263-268, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-993437

ABSTRACT

Intervertebral disc degeneration is the most common cause of chronic low back pain and the leading cause of disability in adults. The fact that lacking of effective treatment methods often causes a serious economic and social burden. Intervertebral disc degeneration is the result of multifactorial factors. The prevalence of intervertebral disc degeneration increases drastically with age, what is more, mechanical trauma, genetic predisposition,lifestyle factors and certain metabolic disorders. At present, the main treatment methods both pharmacological and surgical interventions just aim at relieving symptoms and improving function, and can not fundamentally reverse the process of intervertebral disc degeneration, which not only bring inevitable side effects and high cost, but also the long-term curative effect is limited. In theory, biological therapy can not only reverse or delay the process of it, but also can maximize preservation and restore the normal physiological function of the disc, which has been the focus and hot spot areas of research in recent years. The methods of inhibiting inflammation, promote the proliferation and division of residual cells, stem cell transplantation, cell scaffolds and new biomaterials all provide new ideas and direction for the treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration. This paper makes a review of the research progress in related fields, in order to provide a valuable reference for the selection of intervertebral disc degeneration treatment options.

5.
Rev. Cient. Esc. Estadual Saúde Pública de Goiás Cândido Santiago ; 9 (Ed. Especial, 1ª Oficina de Elaboração de Pareceres Técnicos Científicos (PTC): 9e8, 2023. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, CONASS, ColecionaSUS, SES-GO | ID: biblio-1524065

ABSTRACT

Belimumabe, rituximabe, terapia imunossupressora. Indicação: Nefrite lúpica nos estágios III, IV, V, refratária à terapia imunossupressora. Pergunta: Belimumabe é eficaz (remissão da nefrite, normalização da perda da função renal, qualidade de vida) e seguro (descontinuação devido a eventos adversos totais e eventos adversos graves) para o tratamento de pacientes com nefrite lúpica refratária nos estágios III, IV, V em comparação aos medicamentos disponíveis no Sistema Único de Saúde? Objetivo: Avaliar a segurança e eficácia do belimumabe em comparação com os medicamentos disponíveis no Sistema Único de Saúde em pacientes adultos com nefrite lúpica. Métodos: Revisão rápida de revisões sistemáticas. Levantamento bibliográfico foi realizado nas bases de dados PUBMED, EMBASE, SCOPUS, BVS, EPISTEMONIKOS, Cochrane Library e em registros de revisões sistemáticas e ensaios clínicos. Seguiu estratégias de buscas predefinidas. Foi feita avaliação da qualidade metodológica dos estudos incluídos através da ferramenta AMSTAR-2 (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Version 2). Resultados: Foram selecionadas duas revisões sistemáticas que atendiam aos critérios de elegibilidade, mas nenhum ensaio clínico foi escolhido, pois não atendiam aos critérios de inclusão. Conclusão: a terapia combinada de belimumabe, ou de rituximabe, com tratamento imunossupressor padrão é mais eficaz que o tratamento padrão para alcançar remissão clínica da nefrite lúpica. A terapia combinada é tão segura quanto o tratamento padrão. Belimumabe e rituximabe tem eficácia similar entre si


Belimumab, rituximab, and immunosuppressive therapy. Indication: Refractory lupus nephritis to immunosuppressive therapy in stages III, IV, V. Question: Is belimumab effective (for remission of nephritis, normalization of loss of renal function, quality of life) and safe (for discontinuation due to total adverse events and serious adverse events) in the treatment of patients with refractory lupus nephritis in stages III, IV, V compared to the drugs available in the Brazilian Public Health System? Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of belimumab compared to drugs available in the Brazilian Public Health System in adult patients with lupus nephritis. Methods: Rapid review of systematic reviews. A bibliographic search was done in the PUBMED, EMBASE, SCOPUS, BVS, EPISTEMONIKOS, Cochrane Library databases and in records of systematic reviews and clinical trials. It has followed predefined search strategies. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the AMSTAR-2 tool (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Version 2). Results: Two systematic reviews were selected, which met the eligibility criteria, but no clinical trials were chosen, as they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Conclusion: Combination therapy of belimumab or rituximab with standard immunosuppressive treatment is more effective than standard treatment in achieving clinical remission of lupus nephritis. Combination therapy is as safe as standard treatment. Belimumab and rituximab have similar efficacy to each other


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Lupus Nephritis/drug therapy , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Remission Induction , Antibodies, Monoclonal
6.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, CONASS, ColecionaSUS, SES-GO | ID: biblio-1451819

ABSTRACT

Tecnologia: Dupilumabe e upadacitinibe. Comparadores: Azatioprina, metotrexato, ciclosporina, micofenolato de mofetila. Indicação: Tratamento de dermatite atópica severa em pacientes adultos. Pergunta: Dupilumabe e upadacitinibe são mais eficazes e tão seguros quanto ciclosporina ou outros agentes imunossupressores para obter os desfechos de saúde no tratamento sistêmico de dermatite atópica moderada a grave refratária à terapia atópica? Métodos: Levantamento bibliográfico foi realizado na base de dados PUBMED e Cochrane Library, seguindo estratégias de buscas predefinidas. Foi feita avaliação da qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas com a ferramenta AMSTAR2 (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Version 2). Resultados: Foram selecionados três estudos que atenderam aos critérios de inclusão. Conclusão: Dupilumabe, upadacitinibe, ciclosporina e azatioprina são mais eficazes que placebo nos desfechos de eficácia (reduzir sinais clínicos em escalas, reduzir sintomas em escalas) para tratamento da dermatite atópica moderada a grave refratária à terapia tópica, mas esses medicamentos não diferem entre si. Dupilumabe, upadacitinibe, ciclosporina e azatioprina são bem tolerados e seguros


Technology: Dupilumab, upadacitinibe. Comparators: Azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil. Indication: Treatment of severe atopic dermatitis in adult patients. Question: Are dupilumab and upadacitinib more effective and as safe as cyclosporine or other immunosuppressive agents for achieving health outcomes in the systemic treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis refractory to atopic therapy? Methods: A bibliographic survey was done in the PUBMED e Cochrane Library databases, following predefined search strategies. The methodological quality of systematic reviews was evaluated using the AMSTAR-2 tool (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Version 2). Results: Three studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected. Conclusion: Dupilumab, upadacitinib, cyclosporine, and azathioprine are more effective than placebo on efficacy endpoints (reduce clinical signs on scales, reduce symptoms on scales) for treating moderate to severe atopic dermatitis refractory to topical therapy, but these drugs do not differ from each other. Dupilumab, upadacitinib, cyclosporine, and azathioprine are well tolerated and safe


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Azathioprine/therapeutic use , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Janus Kinase Inhibitors
7.
ABCD (São Paulo, Online) ; 36: e1770, 2023. tab
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1519802

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Despite major advances in the clinical treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, some patients still present with acute colitis and require emergency surgery. AIMS: To evaluate the risk factors for early postoperative complications in patients undergoing surgery for acute colitis in the era of biologic therapy. METHODS: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease admitted for acute colitis who underwent total colectomy at a single tertiary hospital from 2012 to 2022 were evaluated. Postoperative complications were graded according to Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC). Patients with more severe complications (CDC≥2) were compared with those with less severe complications (CDC<2). RESULTS: A total of 46 patients underwent surgery. The indications were: failure of clinical treatment (n=34), patients' or surgeon's preference (n=5), hemorrhage (n=3), toxic megacolon (n=2), and bowel perforation (n=2). There were eight reoperations, 60.9% of postoperative complications classified as CDC≥2, and three deaths. In univariate analyses, preoperative antibiotics use, ulcerative colitis diagnosis, lower albumin levels at admission, and preoperative hospital stay longer than seven days were associated with more severe postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency surgery for acute colitis was associated with a high incidence of postoperative complications. Preoperative use of antibiotics, ulcerative colitis, lower albumin levels at admission, and delaying surgery for more than seven days were associated with more severe early postoperative complications. The use of biologics was not associated with worse outcomes.


RESUMO RACIONAL: Apesar dos enormes avanços no tratamento das doenças inflamatórias intestinais (DII), alguns pacientes apresentam quadros de colite aguda refratária ao tratamento clínico, e necessitam de cirurgia de urgência. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar os fatores de risco associados com complicações pós-operatórias precoces nos pacientes com colite aguda submetidos a colectomia na era das terapias biológicas. MÉTODOS: Pacientes com DII admitidos com colite aguda grave submetidos a colectomia total em hospital terciário no período de 2012 a 2022 foram analisados. As complicações pós-operatórias foram graduadas de acordo com a classificação Clavien-Dindo (CCD). Pacientes com complicações mais graves (CCD≥2) foram comparados com os menos graves (CCD<2). RESULTADOS: Foram submetidos a cirurgia 46 pacientes. As indicações foram: falha do tratamento conservador (n=34), preferência do paciente ou do cirurgião (n=5), hemorragia (n=3), megacólon tóxico (n=2) e perfuração intestinal (n=2). Reoperação foi necessária em oito pacientes, 60,9% tiveram complicações classificadas como CCD≥2, e três pacientes foram a óbito. Análise univariada identificou que uso de antibióticos no pré-operatório, diagnóstico de colite ulcerativa, hipoalbuminemia na admissão e período de internação maior que sete dias foi associada à complicações pós-operatória mais graves. CONCLUSÕES: Pacientes com colite aguda submetidos a cirurgia de urgência apresentaram alta taxa de complicações pós-operatórias. Uso pré-operatório de antibióticos, diagnóstico de retocolite ulcerativa, hipoalbuminemia na admissão e retardo na operação por mais que sete dias, esteve associado a complicações pós-operatórias mais graves. Uso de biológicos não se associou a piores desfechos.

8.
Rev. colomb. reumatol ; 29(4): 239-248, oct.-dic. 2022. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1431789

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Introducción: La relación entre eventos adversos y aplicación de medicamentos biológicos en pacientes con diagnóstico de artritis reumatoide ha sido documentada a escala mundial, pero con escasa evidencia en Colombia. Si se asume que los eventos adversos o reacciones medicamentosas con hallazgos clínicos relevantes en la salud, como consecuencia de este tratamiento terapéutico, recaen sobre la calidad de vida del paciente e influyen en los indicadores de salud a escala nacional y en los recursos del sistema, se hace importante evaluar su impacto. Objetivos: Determinar la frecuencia de eventos adversos o reacciones adversas relacionados con el uso de medicamentos biológicos en una cohorte de pacientes con diagnóstico de artritis reumatoide de una aseguradora nacional, en el periodo comprendido entre los arios 2000 y 2019. Metodología: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo, transversal y retrospectivo, con alcance analítico, en pacientes diagnosticados de artritis reumatoide, con terapia biológica, en una aseguradora a escala nacional, con registros en historias clínicas del año 2000 al 2019. Resultados: Se analizaron 252 registros clínicos de usuarios con diagnóstico de artritis reumatoide y terapia biológica. El 62,7% presentó al menos una reacción adversa y se evaluaron 9 fármacos: tocilizumab, etanercept, adalimumab, abatacept, certolizumab, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab y tofacitinib. Este último es un fármaco incluido en este estudio por solicitud de la aseguradora fuente de la información. Conclusiones: En la terapia biológica de pacientes con artritis reumatoide las reacciones adversas son frecuentes, y en un 27,3% resultan severas, lo cual describe una situación previamente desconocida en Colombia.


ABSTRACT Introduction: The relationship between adverse events and the application of biological drugs in patients with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis has been documented worldwide, but with little evidence of the situation in Colombia. If adverse events and / or drug reactions with relevant clinical findings in health because of this therapeutic treatment affect the patient's quality of life and influence health indicators at the national level and system resources, it is important to assess their impact. Objectives: To determine the frequency of adverse events and / or adverse reactions related to the use of biological drugs in a cohort of patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis from a national insurer, in the period from 2000 to 2019. Methodology: A descriptive, cross-sectional, and retrospective study with analytical scope was carried out in patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, on biological therapy, under a nationwide insurer, with records in their medical records from 2000 to 2019. Results: 252 clinical records of users with a rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis and biological therapy were analysed; 62.7% had at least one adverse reaction; nine drugs were evaluated in this study: Tocilizumab, Etanercept, Adalimumab, Abatacept, Certolizumab, Golimumab, Infliximab, Rituximab, and Tofacitinib. Tofacitinib was included in this study at the request of the insurer providing the information. Conclusions: Adverse reactions with biological therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis are frequent and were severe in 27.3%. This is a situation previously unknown in Colombia.


Subject(s)
Humans , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Joint Diseases
9.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-222999

ABSTRACT

Background: Chronic urticaria, in many cases, has an unsatisfactory response to antihistamines. The current recommendations in urticaria do not mention the dose and duration for methotrexate. Aims: This study aims to systematically review the use/efficacy of methotrexate in chronic urticaria. Methods: A systematic search in four databases, that is, PubMed/Medline, Cochrane central, Google Scholar and Clinicaltrials.gov was done to identify studies on the use of methotrexate in chronic urticaria using key words “methotrexate [MeSH terms]” and “urticaria” or “urticaria, chronic” or “urticaria, chronic spontaneous.” Results: Nine articles (study participants 127), including three randomized control trials, one prospective interventional trial without control, three retrospective reviews and two case reports, were identified and finally included in the systematic review. There was a paucity of literature and the three randomized control trials did not show any benefit of methotrexate over antihistamines alone. However, in studies where steroid- dependent cases were given methotrexate, marked benefit was reported with steroid-sparing effect, particularly on methotrexate dose escalation. Limitations: Due to a paucity of published literature on methotrexate in urticaria, a meta-analysis could not be done. Conclusion: In chronic recalcitrant or steroid-dependent cases, methotrexate may be a therapeutic agent of interest; however, current evidence does not point to any added advantage in efficacy over antihistamines. More evidence based on larger, well-executed randomized control trials is needed in the future to get more definitive answers

10.
Biomédica (Bogotá) ; 42(2): 218-223, ene.-jun. 2022. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1403575

ABSTRACT

Introducción. Se han descrito múltiples efectos adversos con el uso de la terapia biológica para enfermedades autoinmunitarias, muchos de ellos secundarios al estado de inmunosupresión, como las infecciones bacterianas, fúngicas o virales. Caso clínico. Se presenta el caso de una mujer de 64 años con diagnóstico comprobado de criptococosis diseminada secundaria al uso de tofacitinib. Se descartaron otras causas de inmunosupresión, como infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (HIV). Tres años antes se le había diagnosticado artritis reumatoide y se encontraba en tratamiento farmacológico con un agente biológico que inhibe las enzimas JAK. Se han descrito muy pocos casos de criptococosis pulmonar y meníngea en este tipo de pacientes. Conclusión. Este reporte de caso es útil para que otros médicos tratantes tengan presente la posibilidad de este tipo de infección fúngica invasora asociada con la terapia biológica y el enfoque de gestión de riesgo.


Introduction: Multiple adverse effects have been described for the biological therapy in autoimmune diseases including many secondary to immunosuppression producing bacterial, fungal, or viral infections. Clinical case: We present the case of a 64-year-old female patient with proven disseminated cryptococcosis secondary to the use of tofacitinib. Other possible causes of immunosuppression such as the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) were ruled out. The patient had been in treatment for rheumatoid arthritis diagnosed three years before. This drug is a biological agent that inhibits JAK enzymes. Very few cases of pulmonary and meningeal cryptococcosis in this type of patient have been described in the literature. Conclusion: This case report should be useful for other clinicians to bear in mind the possibility of this type of invasive fungal infection associated with biological therapy and to take a risk-management approach.


Subject(s)
Cryptococcosis , Biological Therapy , Cryptococcus neoformans , Medication Errors
11.
Arq. Asma, Alerg. Imunol ; 6(2): 170-196, abr.jun.2022. ilus
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1400199

ABSTRACT

O tratamento do angioedema hereditário tem início com a educação dos pacientes e familiares sobre a doença, pois é fundamental o conhecimento da imprevisibilidade das crises, assim como os seus fatores desencadeantes. O tratamento medicamentoso se divide em terapia das crises e profilaxia das manifestações clínicas. As crises devem ser tratadas o mais precocemente possível com o uso do antagonista do receptor de bradicinina, o icatibanto ou o concentrado de C1-inibidor. É necessário estabeler um plano de ação em caso de crises para todos os pacientes. A profilaxia de longo prazo dos sintomas deve ser realizada preferencialmente com medicamentos de primeira linha, como concentrado do C1-inibidor ou o anticorpo monoclonal anti-calicreína, lanadelumabe. Como segunda linha de tratamento temos os andrógenos atenuados. Na profilaxia de curto prazo, antes de procedimentos que podem desencadear crises, o uso do concentrado de C1-inibidor é preconizado. Existem algumas restrições para uso desses tratamentos em crianças e gestantes que devem ser consideradas. Novos medicamentos baseados nos avanços do conhecimento da fisiopatologia do angioedema hereditário estão em desenvolvimento, devendo melhorar a qualidade de vida dos pacientes. O uso de ferramentas padronizadas para monitorização da qualidade de vida, do controle e da atividade da doença são fundamentais no acompanhamento destes pacientes. A criação de associações de pacientes e familiares de pacientes com angioedema hereditário tem desempenhado um papel muito importante no cuidado destes pacientes no nosso país.


The treatment of hereditary angioedema begins with the education of patients and their families about the disease, as it is essential to know the unpredictability of attacks as well as their triggering factors. Drug treatment is divided into attack therapy and prophylaxis of clinical manifestations. Attacks should be treated as early as possible with the bradykinin receptor antagonist icatibant or C1-inhibitor concentrate. An action plan needs to be established for all patients with attacks. Long-term prophylaxis of symptoms should preferably be performed with first-line drugs such as C1-inhibitor concentrate or the anti-kallikrein monoclonal antibody lanadelumab. Attenuated androgens are the second line of treatment. In short-term prophylaxis, before procedures that can trigger attacks, the use of C1-inhibitor concentrate is recommended. There are some restrictions for the use of these treatments in children and pregnant women that should be considered. New drugs based on advances in knowledge of the pathophysiology of hereditary angioedema are under development and are expected to improve patient quality of life. The use of standardized tools for monitoring quality of life and controlling disease activity is essential in the follow-up of these patients. The creation of associations of patients and families of patients with hereditary angioedema has played a very important role in the care of these patients in Brazil.


Subject(s)
Humans , Drug Therapy , Angioedemas, Hereditary , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Bradykinin Receptor Antagonists , Patients , Quality of Life , Therapeutics , Bradykinin , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Kallikreins , Reference Drugs
12.
Chinese Journal of Dermatology ; (12): 1118-1121, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-957780

ABSTRACT

Traditional therapies for alopecia areata, especially moderate to severe alopecia areata and special types of alopecia areata, remain unsatisfactory. Compared with traditional therapies, small-molecule targeted drugs and biological agents have advantages of a more rapid onset of action and more marked efficacy, however, some patients may experience adverse reactions such as infections during treatment or relapses after drug withdrawal. Thus, their efficacy and safety still need to be further evaluated. This review summarizes research progress in small-molecule targeted drugs and biological agents in the treatment of alopecia areata.

13.
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica ; (12): 627-637, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-922877

ABSTRACT

Exosomes are a kind of endosomal vesicles that are secreted by most if not all living cells. Due to their capability of delivering a variety of cargos, such as tissue- or cell-specific proteins, lipids, and genetic materials, and their broad biological activities, exosomes have gained substantial attention as emerging therapeutics. Exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and dendritic cells (DCs) are two types of exosomes that are widely studied. Many preclinical and clinical studies have shown that they have a satisfactory treatment effect in lung diseases, liver diseases, nervous system diseases, tumors, and other diseases. In addition, exosomes from macrophages, tumor cells, plant cells, and many other cells are getting more attention due to their therapeutic potential. Besides natural exosomes, research on engineered exosomes has also made plenty of progress. There have been several engineering methods of exosomes, such as targeting modification and loading of active ingredients. In this review, we summarize the research progress of therapeutic exosomes from different sources, and further discusses the application prospects of exosomes and possible challenges in the future.

14.
Med. lab ; 26(1): 63-80, 2022. Grafs, Tabs
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1370955

ABSTRACT

Las reacciones a medicamentos han aumentado con el tiempo, estas implican ahora una carga importante de enfermedad, principalmente en los servicios de hospitalización. Los agentes quimioterapéuticos y biológicos son fármacos utilizados con frecuencia en enfermedades reumatológicas y neoplasias de diferente orden. Las reacciones de hipersensibilidad a quimioterapéuticos y monoclonales impactan en la calidad de vida, el pronóstico y la mortalidad de los pacientes con enfermedades autoinmunes y cáncer, es por eso que deben ser reconocidas y manejadas por un equipo de trabajo multidisciplinar. La desensibilización es una herramienta terapéutica que ofrece grandes beneficios a los pacientes con reacciones de hipersensibilidad, permitiéndoles la utilización de medicamentos de primera línea de manera segura y costoefectiva, con un impacto importante en la morbilidad y mortalidad de estos pacientes. El objetivo de este artículo fue revisar la información y evidencia más reciente sobre las reacciones de hipersensibilidad a quimioterapéuticos y biológicos, y los datos sobre las opciones de desensibilización con estos medicamentos y su desenlace


Drug reactions have increased over time, they now imply a significant burden of disease mainly in hospital services. Chemotherapeutic and biological agents are drugs frequently used in different rheumatological diseases and neoplasms. Hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapeutic and monoclonal drugs impact the quality of life, prognosis and mortality of patients with autoimmune diseases and cancer, that is why they must be recognized and managed by a multidisciplinary team. Desensitization is a therapeutic tool that offers great benefits to patients with hypersensitivity reactions, allowing them to use first-line drugs in a safe and cost-effective manner, with a significant impact on patient morbidity and mortality. The objective of this article was to review the most recent information and evidence on hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapeutics and biologics, and data on desensitization options with these drugs and their outcome


Subject(s)
Humans , Drug Hypersensitivity , Biological Therapy , Desensitization, Immunologic , Hypersensitivity , Antineoplastic Agents
15.
Rev. cuba. reumatol ; 23(3)dic. 2021.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, CUMED | ID: biblio-1409171

ABSTRACT

resumen está disponible en el texto completo


Introduction: The development of recommendations for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the Cuban context may be one of the ways to achieve better control of this disease. Objective: To reach a consensus and update relevant aspects of conventional and biological RA modifier therapy in Cuba. Methods: 18 specialists from 8 Cuban provinces, experts in RA care, were summoned, according to the years of dedication to the specialty, the conferences on this topic and their publications. The first meeting took place in March 2016 in the provincial hospital of Villa Clara, Cuba, with the participation of all the experts. A review of the literature on conventional and biological therapy previously collected by the participants was developed, and two teams were formed: the first would address everything related to conventional therapy in RA (HRCT) and the other, biological therapy in RA (TBAR). Three questionnaires related to the use of corticosteroids, HRCT and TBAR, were prepared, answered by the participants via email. In a second meeting, held in October 2016 in Havana, the analysis of all the responses provided was carried out. Questions with a response of 90% or more votes were considered as recommendations. Results: The questionnaires were answered by 95% of the participants. 9 recommendations and 1 algorithm were established. The recommendations are as follows: methotrexate is the drug of choice in the treatment of RA after diagnosis; The administration of another conventional drug (DMARDc) (azathioprine, salazosulfapyridine, antimalarials and leflunomide) is recommended in patients with a diagnosis of active RA in whom methotrexate is contraindicated or there is a failure in response - consider the administration of low doses of prednisone or equivalent (<7.5 mg/d) associated with DMARDc in patients with active moderate to severe RA, for the shortest possible time; perform serological control including tests for hepatitis B and C viruses and screening for HIV in all patients diagnosed with RA before starting treatment with DMARDc and biologics; in patients in remission or, at least, with a DAS-28 below 3.2, consideration should be given to withdrawing one of the DMARDs or reducing, to the minimum possible expression, the dose of both disease modifiers; if methotrexate fails, tocilizumab in combination with methotrexate or as monotherapy will be indicated. Conclusions: Aspects related to conventional therapy with methotrexate, azathioprine, salazosulfapyridine, antimalarials and leflunomide were agreed. The value of early diagnosis and immediate initiation of DMARDc therapy and the use of glucocorticoids was analyzed. Treatment with tocilizumab, the only biological available in Cuba against RA, will be administered when there is a failure in the response to conventional therapy and combinations between these drugs. It is recommended to hold educational conferences through the mass media aimed at patientshttp(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Biological Therapy/methods , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/therapy
16.
Biomédica (Bogotá) ; 41(3): 472-480, jul.-set. 2021. graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1345397

ABSTRACT

Resumen Introducción. La artritis reumatoide es una enfermedad autoinmunitaria, crónica y deformante asociada con discapacidad. Quienes la padecen reciben inmunosupresores y tienen un gran riesgo de desarrollar tuberculosis. La prueba de intradermorreacción a la tuberculina se utiliza como tamización en quienes van a recibir terapia biológica. Objetivo. Evaluar la frecuencia de positividad en la prueba de intradermorreacción a la tuberculina en una cohorte de pacientes con artritis reumatoide. Materiales y métodos. Se hizo un estudio descriptivo de corte transversal de una cohorte de pacientes con artritis reumatoide a quienes se les practicó la prueba de tuberculina antes de iniciar la terapia biológica o en el momento del cambio de tratamiento. Los pacientes presentaban enfermedad moderada o grave y eran candidatos para iniciar o cambiar de terapia biológica. Se definió el valor de ≥6 mm como punto de corte para la positividad de la prueba y se hizo un análisis descriptivo de cada una de las variables. Resultados. Se incluyeron 261 pacientes con artritis reumatoide, 92 % de ellos eran mujeres, la edad promedio fue de 55 años (desviación estándar, DE=13,92) y el tiempo desde el diagnóstico era de 12,3 años (DE=8,54). La frecuencia de positividad de la prueba fue de 15,71 % (n=41). Nueve de los 41 pacientes positivos habían recibido la prueba previamente (entre 1 y 6 años antes), todos con resultado negativo; 18 (43,9 %) de ellos venían recibiendo tratamiento con glucocorticoides y todos los 41 (100 %) recibían metotrexate. Conclusiones. La frecuencia de positividad de la prueba de tuberculina en pacientes colombianos con artritis reumatoide fue de aproximadamente 16 %. Se recomienda optimizar las estrategias para detectar esta condición y darle un tratamiento oportuno y, así, disminuir el riesgo de reactivación de la tuberculosis.


Abstract Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune, chronic, and deforming condition associated with disability. Patients are immunosuppressed and at high risk of developing tuberculosis. The tuberculin skin test is used to screen candidates for biological therapy. Objective: To evaluate the frequency of positivity of the tuberculin skin test in a cohort of Colombian patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Materials and methods: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study including patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving the tuberculin skin test prior to the start or at the time of the change of biological therapy. The patients' condition was moderate or severe and they were candidates for initiation or change of biological therapy. We defined the value of ≥6 mm as the cut-off point for a positive tuberculin skin test and performed a descriptive analysis for each of the variables considered. Results: In total, 261 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were included, 92 % of whom were women; the average age was 55 years (SD=13.92) and the time from diagnosis, 12.3 years (SD=8.54). The frequency of positive tuberculin skin tests was 15.71% (n=41). Of the 41 positive patients, nine had previously had the test (1 to 6 years before), all of them with negative results; 18 of these were receiving glucocorticoids (43.9%) and all of them (100%) were being treated with methotrexate. Conclusions: The frequency of positivity of the tuberculin skin test in these Colombian patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis was around 16%. We recommend optimizing strategies aimed at an optimal detection of this condition and the timely initiation of treatment to reduce the risk of tuberculosis reactivation.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology , Tuberculosis , Biological Therapy , Risk
17.
Journal of Clinical Hepatology ; (12): 1205-1207., 2021.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-876669

ABSTRACT

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors with high mortality in clinical practice. With the development of imaging and interventional techniques, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and local ablation are more and more widely used for treatment and can even achieve a similar effect as surgery in the treatment of some types of early-stage HCC. In addition, precision medicine and biomedicine have also developed vigorously; radiochemotherapy is more accurate and effective in the treatment of HCC, and molecular targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and gene therapy have become the directions for breakthrough in the future. This article reviews the latest advances in the non-surgical treatment of HCC.

18.
Arq. gastroenterol ; 57(4): 507-510, Oct.-Dec. 2020. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1142339

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab (IFX) has been recognized as an important strategy in the management of secondary loss of response to this agent, guiding clinical decision-making in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Although most of the data on the application of TDM for IFX refer to the maintenance phase of treatment, many studies have associated higher drug concentrations, specially in the induction phase, with achievement of important treatment targets, such as clinical remission and mucosal healing. This brief communication aims to summarize the literature on the use of TDM during induction phase of IFX and propose application of a simplified approach which can be useful into clinical practice, aiming better outcomes to IBD patients.


RESUMO A monitorização terapêutica dos níveis séricos (Therapeutic drug monitoring - TDM) de infliximabe (IFX) é uma estratégia reconhecida na tomada de decisão clínica frente a perda de resposta secundária a esta droga no manejo das doenças inflamatórias intestinais (DII). Embora a maioria dos dados sobre a aplicação dessa estratégia para IFX se refira à fase de manutenção do tratamento, muitos estudos associaram concentrações mais altas de IFX, especialmente na fase de indução, com o alcance de importantes alvos de tratamento, como remissão clínica e cicatrização da mucosa. Este artigo visa resumir as evidências da literatura sobre o uso de níveis séricos durante a fase de indução do IFX e propor a aplicação de uma abordagem simplificada que pode ser extremamente útil na prática clínica, visando melhores resultados para os pacientes.


Subject(s)
Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Drug Monitoring , Infliximab/therapeutic use , Algorithms , Gastrointestinal Agents/therapeutic use
19.
Arq. gastroenterol ; 57(4): 491-497, Oct.-Dec. 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1142345

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Biological therapy and new drugs have revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Ideally, the choice of medication should be a shared decision with the patient, aiming at greater satisfaction, compliance, and consequently, favorable clinical outcome. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate patient's preferences in the choice of their therapy and the factors that influence this choice. METHODS: This cross-sectional study enrolled 101 outpatients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis. The inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and no previous exposure to biological therapy. Patients' preferences were assessed through questions that addressed the preferred mode of administration (oral, subcutaneous, or intravenous) and the factors that determined the choice of medication (efficacy, medical indication, fear of medication, convenience, mode of application, and personal doctors' indication). RESULTS: The mean age was 43.6±13.5 years, 75.3% were female, and 81.2% were cases of ulcerative colitis. Regarding the mode of administration, the majority of patients preferred oral (87.1%), followed by intravenous (6.93%) and subcutaneous (5.94%) medications. The reasons were "I prefer to take it at home" (42.57%), "I have more freedom" (36.63%), "I don't like self-application" (29.70%), and "I believe it works better" (19.80%). Younger patients and patients in clinical disease activity preferred intravenous mode compared to the oral route (P<0.05). Doctor's opinion (98%) was an important factor associated with the medication choice. CONCLUSION: Oral route was the preferred mode of administration and most patients took their physician's opinion into account in their choice of medication.


RESUMO CONTEXTO: A terapia biológica e os novos medicamentos revolucionaram o tratamento da doença inflamatória intestinal. A escolha do medicamento deve ser compartilhada com o paciente, visando maior satisfação, adesão e, consequentemente, desfecho clínico favorável. OBJETIVO: Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar as preferências do paciente na escolha de sua terapia e os fatores que influenciaram essa escolha. MÉTODOS: Este estudo transversal incluiu 101 pacientes ambulatoriais com doença de Crohn ou retocolite ulcerativa. Os critérios de inclusão foram idade ≥18 anos e nenhuma exposição prévia à terapia biológica. A preferência dos pacientes foi avaliada por meio de perguntas que abordaram o modo de administração preferido (oral, subcutâneo ou intravenoso) e os fatores que determinaram a escolha do medicamento (eficácia, indicação médica, medo da injeção, conveniência, modo de aplicação e opinião pessoal do médico). RESULTADOS: A idade média foi de 43,6±13,5 anos, 75,3% eram mulheres e 81,2% eram portadores de retocolite ulcerativa. Em relação ao modo de administração, a maioria dos pacientes preferiu os medicamentos orais (87,1%), seguidos dos endovenosos (6,93%) e subcutâneos (5,94%). Os motivos foram "prefiro aplicar em casa" (42,57%), "tenho mais liberdade com essa medicação" (36,63%), "não gosto de autoaplicação" (29,70%) e "acredito que funcione melhor" (19,80%). Pacientes jovens e pacientes em atividade clínica preferiram a via intravenosa em comparação com a via oral (P<0,05). A opinião do médico (98%) foi um fator importante associado à escolha do medicamento. CONCLUSÃO: A via oral foi preferida e a maioria dos pacientes levou em consideração a opinião do seu médico na escolha do medicamento.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Gastrointestinal Agents/administration & dosage , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Patient Satisfaction , Patient Preference , Injections, Subcutaneous/statistics & numerical data , Biological Therapy , Gastrointestinal Agents/therapeutic use , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Middle Aged
20.
Rev. colomb. gastroenterol ; 35(supl.2): 2-62, nov. 2020. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1144367

ABSTRACT

Resumen Objetivo: desde 2015, la Asociación Colombiana de Gastroenterología, con el apoyo del Instituto de Investigaciones Clínicas de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia, realizó la guía de práctica clínica para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de colitis ulcerativa. Desde la publicación de esta guía, han aparecido nuevas alternativas terapéuticas y nuevos conceptos sobre los objetivos del tratamiento, por lo cual se consideró necesaria su actualización. Materiales y métodos: esta actualización fue realizada por un equipo multi-disciplinario con apoyo de la Asociación Colombiana de Gastroenterología y el Instituto de Investigaciones Clínicas de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Se desarrollaron preguntas relevantes a nuevos tratamientos y vigilancia endoscópica de los pacientes adultos con colitis ulcerativa y se realizó la búsqueda de guías nacionales e internacionales en bases de datos especializadas. Las guías fueron evaluadas en términos de calidad y aplicabilidad. El Grupo Cochrane llevó a cabo la búsqueda sistemática de la literatura. Las tablas de evidencia y recomendaciones fueron realizadas usando la metodología GRADE. Resultados: se realizó una actualización de la guía para el tratamiento de la colitis ulcerativa en adultos en Colombia y se diseñaron nuevos algoritmos de tratamiento, teniendo en cuenta la extensión y la actividad de la enfermedad y los diferentes niveles de atención. Conclusiones: se estableció la importancia para el tratamiento de la evaluación clínica y endoscópica y se especificaron las indicaciones para el adecuado tratamiento de los pacientes con colitis ulcerativa. Adicionalmente, se dieron recomendaciones de vigilancia endoscópica de cáncer colorrectal y la importancia de la cromoendoscopia.


Abstract Objective: In 2015, the Asociación Colombiana de Gastroenterología (Colombian Association of Gastroenterology), with the support of the Institute of Clinical Research of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, created the Clinical Practice Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of ulcerative colitis. Since then, new therapeutic alternatives and concepts about treatment goals have emerged, making it necessary to update its contents. Materials and methods: The present update was carried out by a multidisciplinary team with support from the Asociación Colombiana de Gastroenterología and the Clinical Research Institute of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Questions regarding new treatments and endoscopic surveillance of adult patients with ulcerative colitis were developed, and national and international guidelines were searched in specialized databases. The guidelines were evaluated in terms of quality and applicability. The Cochrane Group conducted a systematic search of the existing literature, and evidence tables and recommendations were made using the GRADE methodology. Results: The guideline for the treatment of ulcerative colitis in adults in Colombia was updated, and new treatment algorithms were designed, taking into account the extent and activity of the disease and the different levels of care. Conclusions: The relevance of clinical and endoscopic assessment for treatment was established, and the indications for the proper management of patients with ulcerative colitis were specified. Furthermore, recommendations were made for endoscopic surveillance of colorectal cancer, and the importance of chromoendoscopy was established.


Subject(s)
Humans , Therapeutics , Colorectal Neoplasms , Colitis, Ulcerative , Diagnosis , Patients , Literature
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL